Skip to content
  • logo
  • Socially Aware
    The Law and Business of Social Media
Home
Advertising Antitrust Arbitration Artificial Intelligence Asia Autonomous Vehicles Bankruptcy Big Data Blockchain CFAA COPPA Class Actions Cloud Computing Compliance Contracts Copyright Crowdsourcing Cyberbullying Cybersecurity DMCA DOJ Daily Deals Data Security Defamation Digital Content Disappearing Content Discovery E-Commerce E-Discovery E-Personation Electronic Contracts Employment Law Endorsement Guides Ephemeral Messaging Ethics European Union Event FCA Regulations FCC FCPA FDA Regulations FEC Regulations FINRA FTC Failure to Warn Fair Use Federal Communications Commission Reform Act Financial Institutions First Amendment Fraud Free Speech GDPR Hacking IP Influencer Marketing Infographic Internet of Things Investment Management Law JOBS Act Jurisdiction Labor Law Litigation Live streaming M&A Malware Marketing Mobile NAD News and Announcements Online Contracts Online Endorsements Online Promotions Online Reviews Patent Privacy Product Liability Protected Speech Right To Be Forgotten Right of Publicity SEC Section 230 Safe Harbor Securities Law Social Media Policy Statistics Status Updates Stored Communications Act Supreme Court Terms of Use Trade Secrets Trademark UK UK High Court User-Generated Content Wearable Computers Web Scraping
Editors
About
Subscribe ☰

Topic Archives: Arbitration

June 23, 2020 - Arbitration, Litigation, Online Contracts, Terms of Use

Sweating the Details: Court Analyzes User Interface to Uphold Online Arbitration Clause

By: Aaron P. Rubin

Online service providers typically seek to mitigate risk by including arbitration clauses in their user agreements. In order for such agreements to be effective, however, they must be implemented properly. Babcock vs. Neutron Holdings, Inc., a recent Southern District of Florida case involving a …›

July 22, 2019 - Arbitration, Litigation, Terms of Use

Court Holds that Arbitration Clause in “Hybridwrap” Terms Is Unenforceable

By: Aaron P. Rubin

A federal district court in Illinois recently held in Anand v. Heath that a digital marketing company could not force a user to arbitrate because a “Continue” button on its website did not provide clear notice that clicking the button constituted assent to the …›

Post Navigation

Stay Connected
Topics
Recent Posts
  • Social Links: Behavioral targeting under scrutiny from lawmakers
  • Forgot to Cancel? Pay Attention to Recent Auto-Renewal Law Changes
  • Facebook rebrands as “Meta;” disables facial recognition capabilities
  • District Court Enjoins Controversial Texas Social Media “Censorship” Law
  • Social Links: Embedding social media posts can be considered copyright infringement…but is it?
@MoFoLLP
Tweets by @MoFoLLP
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Attorney Advertising

©1996-2022 Morrison & Foerster LLP.
All Rights Reserved.

Subscribe

Never miss a post from Socially Aware. Enter your email below to stay up-to-date.